Subject	This must be a new world record 1345rwhp 300ZX engine
Posted by	NitroPow on July 19, 2006 at 3:26 PM
	This message has been viewed 754 times.
Message	This is not a joke. A mechanic here in my area built this engine and they put it on a Ford Escord. 07/11/2007 they took the car to the dyno and at 1.5 bar it showed 695rwhp at 7000RPMS. Then at one point after raising the boost the dyno showed constant 1000rwhp. Couldnt read more. So they change the dyno parameters so as to show the horsepower per axle. And at 2.5 bar it showed 659.11rwhp per wheel. Thats is a total 1345rwhp and 138Kg (1380Nm) torque. Here is a picture of the engine with twin T-66 Now the car is upgraded to twin T-72 and can work up to 3bar. The car is able to work 3bar. Here is the dyno [ http://www.maxpower.co.uk/gallery/detail.asp?imageid= ]{3B67AF1F-BBB1-48F8-9390-43B32258A4FB}&gid=14632 Speed is a passion that can lead to madness.
Follow Ups	This must be a new world record 1345rwhp 300ZX engine - NitroPow 15:26:55 07/19/06 back from the future ;-) (n/m) - davidztt 15:31:00 07/19/06 thats why it has that much horse power its from the future - twiztidZ 15:32:22 07/19/06 My bad :) 2006 (n/m) - NitroPow 15:36:33 07/19/06 To view the dyno remove the ] and the space - NitroPow 15:35:18 07/19/06 that's impressive - moxie 15:35:45 07/19/06 The chart is pretty much worthless - Kenny 15:48:27 07/19/06 Yeah, much rather have power/tq vs engine speed (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 15:54:46 07/19/06 That and AF at least. (n/m) - Kenny 16:09:46 07/19/06 That's some great torque! I think a Kia would beat it from - Scotts94z32 15:59:19 07/19/06 Hi =). (n/m) - Kenny 16:10:04 07/19/06 I concur. - whatsthegoodword 19:40:48 07/19/06 Re: I concur. (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 21:35:18 07/19/06 Impressive! Would be nice to have a better dyno chart. - TheTwinZ (Peru) 17:44:01 07/19/06 Re: This must be a new world record 1345rwhp 300ZX engine - 300zx swap 20:08:54 07/19/06 I'm a bit confused. - TriniTT 21:14:12 07/19/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.